Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
II UZ 3/07 Généré par l'IA

Supreme Court dismissed appeal against rejection of retrial claim based on newly discovered evidence. Appeal rejected as second instance court properly handled case merits.

Numéro de cause II UZ 3/07
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Pologne (PL)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the appellant's appeal against the appellate court's rejection of a retrial request. The appellant argued that a crucial employment certificate was overlooked by the second-instance court despite being newly discovered, while the court held that formal citation of the retrial ground does not guarantee its substantive existence. The decision clarified that a second-instance court ruling on the merits, even by dismissing an appeal, constitutes a judgment on the case's substance, making it the proper venue for retrial proceedings.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 403 § 2 k.p.c.; Art. 410 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 405 k.p.c. A retrial claim based on newly discovered evidence is inadmissible if the circumstances do not substantively exist, and a second-instance court ruling on the merits, including dismissal of an appeal, is considered a judgment on the substance of the case.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
retrial proceedings newly discovered evidence second instance court substance of case appellate jurisdiction formal requirements civil procedure code

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 403 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 410 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 405 k.p.c.
Art. 398 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 394 § 3 k.p.c.
art. 403 § 2 k.p.c
art. 381 k.p.c
art. 405 k.p.c
art. 409 k.p.c
art. 410 § 1 k.p.c

Jurisprudence citée

Généré par l'IA

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet