Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
I UK 266/06 Généré par l'IA

Social security court dismisses appeal for citing entire law instead of specific article.

Numéro de cause I UK 266/06
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Pologne (PL)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by the social security agency against a lower court's decision. The agency argued that the court erred by issuing a new pension decision despite a prior final judgment, claiming this violated the principle of res judicata. The court ruled that a final judgment does not preclude a new application if new circumstances arise, and the agency failed to cite a specific article of the Social Security Fund Act. Consequently, the appeal was rejected because the agency's procedural error in citing the entire statute rather than a specific provision was not a valid ground for cassation.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 398 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 199 § 1 pkt 2 k.p.c.; The failure to cite a specific article of the Social Security Fund Act renders the legal basis invalid, and a final judgment does not bar a new application when new circumstances have occurred.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
social security law res judicata exception cassation appeal dismissal specific article citation new circumstances rule pension entitlement administrative procedure

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 398 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 199 § 1 pkt 2 k.p.c.
Art. 114 of the Act of 17 December 1998 on pensions and allowances from the Social Insurance Fund
art. 199 § 1 pkt 2 k.p.c
art. 39814 k.p.c

Jurisprudence citée

Généré par l'IA
II UK 404/03
Final court ruling allows re-evaluation of work accident disability pension despite prior final judgment.
II UZP 18/96
Social security court allows re-evaluation of farmer pension rights under old law after new evidence submitted post-act change.
II UZP 7/78
II URN 131/83
II URN 182/86
II UKN 50/96
Social security pension review requires special statute over civil code; error in insurance period does not bar retrial.
II UKN 231/99
Final judgment bars re-litigation of social security benefits unless new evidence or circumstances exist.
I UK 11/05
Final war invalidity ruling does not bar new pension claims if medical conditions have changed since the original decision.
II UKN 105/98
Supreme Court dismisses appeal due to res judicata when same claim was previously adjudicated between identical parties.
II UKN 373/98
Social security appeal dismissed due to res judicata regarding prior invalidly decided disability pension claims.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet