Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
II PK 53/06 Généré par l'IA

Total employee inactivity in exercising privatization rights due to personal fault bars compensation claims against the state or employer.

Numéro de cause II PK 53/06
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Pologne (PL)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by Waldemar P. against a lower court ruling that rejected his claim for damages. The plaintiff, a former insurance agent, failed to timely purchase privatization shares despite being on the official list and receiving verbal notice, resulting in the expiration of his right. The court held that the total inactivity was solely due to the plaintiff's own negligence, creating no causal link between the defendants' actions and the loss of value.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 38 ust. 2 ustawy o komercjalizacji i prywatyzacji; Art. 398 § 14 k.p.c.: Total employee inactivity in exercising privatization rights due to personal fault bars compensation claims against the state or employer when no causal link exists between their conduct and the loss.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
privatization rights employee inactivity causal link personal fault damages claim expiration of right state liability

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 38 ust. 2 ustawy z dnia 30 sierpnia 1996 r. o komercjalizacji i prywatyzacji
Art. 398 § 14 k.p.c.
Art. 102 k.p.c.
art. 471 k.c
art. 415 k.c
art. 361 k.c
art. 474 k.c
art. 112 k.p
art. 362 k.c
art. 16 k.p

Jurisprudence citée

Généré par l'IA
I PK 386/03
Supreme Court remands case to assess if postal service's failure to notify employee about stock rights caused damages.
I PK 272/02
Failure to promptly notify employees of rights to acquire shares justifies compensation for lost share entitlement.
I PK 291/03
Company formed from state privatization owes compensation for employee rights violation under Civil Code Art. 471.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet