I PK 89/06
Généré par l'IA
Employer bears burden to prove employee's fitness after sick leave exhaustion; dismissal without notice requires medical evidence.
Pologne (PL)
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal, sending the case back to the lower court for a new ruling. The plaintiff argued that the employer failed to prove the employee was fit for work on the day he returned after exhausting his sick leave. The court held that the burden of proving continued incapacity falls on the employer, who must order new medical examinations rather than relying on prior ZUS decisions.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAArt. 53 § 1 pkt 1 lit. b k.p.; Art. 53 § 3 k.p.; Art. 233 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 240 § 1 k.p.c. The burden of proving an employee's continued incapacity to work after exhausting sick leave rests with the employer, who must order appropriate medical examinations.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IA
burden of proof
incapacity to work
dismissal without notice
medical examination
sick leave exhaustion
labor law
employer obligation
Dispositions légales citées
Généré par l'IAArt. 53 § 1 pkt 1 lit. b k.p.
Art. 53 § 3 k.p.
Art. 233 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 240 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 393 § 1 k.p.c.
art. 385 k.p.c
art. 379 pkt 5 k.p.c
art. 240 § 1 k.p.c
art. 278 § 1 k.p.c
art. 53 § 3 k.p
Jurisprudence citée
Généré par l'IAI PK 649/03, OSNP 2005 nr 12, poz. 173
I PK 89/05
I PK 649/03
Employer's right to terminate without notice is independent of social security rehabilitation benefit proceedings.