Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
II UZP 3/06 Généré par l'IA

Supreme Court rules that a lawyer's practice does not qualify as employment under police pension law.

Numéro de cause II UZP 3/06
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Pologne (PL)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal regarding the inclusion of a lawyer's pre-1999 practice in a police pension calculation. The applicant argued that his time as an advocate should count as half-time employment, but the Pension Fund only recognized his period as an apprentice. The Court held that while advocates share some social security rights with employees, they are not legally considered employees under the specific police pension statute, which requires a formal employment relationship.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 14 ust. 1 pkt 1 ustawy z dnia 18 lutego 1994 r. o zaopatrzeniu emerytalnym funkcjonariuszy Policji...; Art. 24 ust. 1 i art. 37 ustawy z dnia 26 maja 1982 r. - Prawo o adwokaturze: The concept of employment under the police pension law excludes the independent practice of a lawyer, as the statutory system requires a formal employment relationship distinct from the social security rights enjoyed by advocates.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
police pension law lawyer employment status social security system statutory interpretation half-time employment advocate rights pension calculation

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 14 ust. 1 pkt 1 ustawy z dnia 18 lutego 1994 r. o zaopatrzeniu emerytalnym funkcjonariuszy Policji...
Art. 24 ust. 1 i art. 37 ustawy z dnia 26 maja 1982 r. - Prawo o adwokaturze
art. 390 § 1 k.p.c
art. 386 § 6 k.p.c
art. 390 § 2 k.p.c
art. 389 k.p.c
art. 390 k.p.c

Jurisprudence citée

Généré par l'IA
II UKN 44/97
Supreme Court dismisses lawyer's work accident claim, ruling individual practice lawyers are not employees under work injury law.
I PKN 535/00
Supreme Court dismissed attorney's appeal on anniversary bonus, ruling no employment relationship exists with law firm.
I PK 548/03
Supreme Court dismissed cassation against patent royalty award, ruling procedural errors did not affect substantive correctness.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet