II BP 1/05
Généré par l'IA
Supreme Court dismissed appeal claiming final judgment violated law due to ambiguous regulation interpretation.
Pologne (PL)
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe Supreme Court dismissed the defendant hospital's appeal challenging a final labor court judgment awarding seniority pay to a nurse. The lower court applied more favorable rules to the plaintiff because the hospital's internal regulation improperly excluded her prior work experience, violating equal treatment principles. The Supreme Court held that when a regulation can be reasonably interpreted in multiple ways, a final judgment based on one valid interpretation cannot be deemed legally inconsistent.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAArt. 4244 k.p.c.; Art. 42411 § 1 k.p.c. A final court decision cannot be declared inconsistent with the law if the cited regulations admit of reasonable alternative interpretations supported by convincing arguments.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IA
final judgment review
legal inconsistency appeal
regulation interpretation
reasonable doubt standard
labor law equal treatment
seniority pay calculation
administrative regulation validity
Dispositions légales citées
Généré par l'IAArt. 4244 k.p.c.
Art. 42411 § 1 k.p.c.
art. 4244 k.p.c
art. 112 k.p
art. 113 k.p
art. 9 § 2 k.p
art. 9 § 1 k.p
art. 5 k.p
art. 772 § 5 k.p
art. 42411 § 1 k.p.c