Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
II PK 118/05 Généré par l'IA

Non-payment of non-compete damages does not release employee from non-compete obligation; damages require actual non-competition.

Numéro de cause II PK 118/05
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Pologne (PL)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal against a lower court ruling that rejected the employee's claim for non-compete damages. The employee argued he resumed work only after the employer failed to pay the first installment, while the employer contended he immediately engaged in competitive activities upon termination. The court held that non-payment of damages does not automatically release the employee from the non-compete obligation, and damages are only due if the employee actually refrains from competing.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 1012 § 2 k.p.; Art. 491 § 1 k.c.: Non-payment of compensation for non-compete restriction does not release the employee from the obligation to refrain from competitive activities; damages are payable only if the employee actually complies with the non-compete restriction.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
non-compete agreement compensation damages employee obligation competitive activity mutual obligation labor law contractual breach

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 1012 § 2 k.p.
Art. 491 § 1 k.c.
Art. 487 § 2 k.c.
Art. 393 § 13 k.p.c.
art. 1012 § 2 k.p
art. 328 § 2 k.p.c
art. 233 k.p.c
art. 3531 k.c
art. 487 § 2 k.c
art. 300 k.p

Jurisprudence citée

Généré par l'IA

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet