Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
III PZP 2/05 Généré par l'IA

Supreme Court dismisses legal question submission as it is not a legal issue but a factual assessment of employment transfer.

Numéro de cause III PZP 2/05
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Pologne (PL)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Irrecevable (Inadmissible)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Supreme Court of Poland refused to adopt a ruling on a legal question submitted by the lower court regarding an employment transfer. The lower court had found that the transfer of medical tasks and associated assets constituted a change of employer under Article 231 of the Labor Code. The Supreme Court determined that the submitted question was not an abstract legal issue but rather a request to re-evaluate the specific factual circumstances already established by the lower courts. Consequently, the court declined to intervene, ruling that the matter required a decision on the appeal rather than a precedent-setting ruling.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 231 k.p.; Art. 390 § 1 k.p.c.; A question submitted to the Supreme Court must be an abstract legal issue, not a request to re-evaluate specific factual circumstances already determined by lower courts.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
legal question submission labor code transfer employment relationship change Supreme Court procedure factual assessment review

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 231 k.p.
Art. 390 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 61 § 1 ustawy z dnia 23 listopada 2002 r. o Sądzie Najwyższym
art. 231 k.p
art. 390 k.p.c
art. 178 ust. 1 Konstytucji
art. 390 § 1 k.p.c
art. 390 § 2 k.p.c

Jurisprudence citée

Généré par l'IA
III CZP 145/95
I PZP 1/95
Postanowienie z dnia 3 lutego 1995 r.
I PK 288/03
Public task transfer under Art. 231 k.p. establishes employer change without property acquisition requirement.
I PK 103/04
Transfer of business premises automatically transfers employees, preventing the former employer from terminating their contracts.
III CZP 62/98
III CZP 2/02
III CZP 30/03
III CZP 91/96

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet