Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
III PK 94/05 Généré par l'IA

Supreme Court dismissed appeal; four-year pre-retirement protection applies only to dismissals effective after June 1, 2004.

Numéro de cause III PK 94/05
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Pologne (PL)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff's cassation appeal regarding a termination of her employment contract with a school. The lower court found that the employer's dismissal, effective May 12, 2004, did not violate the four-year pre-retirement protection period because the new law extending this period to four years only became effective on June 1, 2004. The court clarified that the protection period begins from the date the dismissal becomes effective, not from the date the notice was issued, meaning the four-year rule did not apply to this specific termination.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 39 k.p.; Art. 13 ustawy o świadczeniach przedemerytalnych; The four-year protection period for pre-retirement employees applies only to dismissals effective on or after the date the extended period commenced, not to dismissals issued prior to that date.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
pre-retirement protection termination of employment effective date of dismissal notice period calculation labor law amendment cassation appeal dismissal validity

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 39 k.p.
Art. 13 ustawy z dnia 30 kwietnia 2004 r. o świadczeniach przedemerytalnych
Art. 20 ust. 1 pkt 2 ustawy z dnia 26 stycznia 1982 r. - Karta Nauczyciela
Art. 30 § 4 k.p.
Art. 943 k.p.
Art. 61 k.c.
Art. 300 k.p.
Art. 398 § 14 k.p.c.
art. 39 k.p
art. 30 § 4 k.p

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet