Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
I PK 68/05 Généré par l'IA

Supreme Court dismisses appeal; indefinite contract cannot transform to fixed-term without explicit statutory provision.

Numéro de cause I PK 68/05
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Pologne (PL)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal, quashing the lower court's decision that transformed an indefinite-term employment contract into a fixed-term one. The plaintiff argued that a five-year service period automatically converted the contract, while the employer contended the original agreement remained indefinite. The court ruled that Article 58 of the Civil Code does not permit such a transformation by operation of law, as no specific statute authorizes it.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 58 § 1, § 3 k.c.; A change in the terms of an employment contract by operation of law requires a specific statutory provision, and the Civil Code does not authorize the transformation of an indefinite-term contract into a fixed-term one.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
employment contract transformation indefinite term contract fixed term contract operation of law Civil Code Article 58 labor law supremacy statutory authorization

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 58 § 3 k.c.
Art. 58 § 1 k.c.
Art. 393 § 1 k.p.c.
art. 385 k.p.c
art. 58 § 3 k.c
art. 3931 k.p.c
art. 45 § 1 k.p
art. 382 k.p.c
art. 68 § 2 k.p
art. 68 k.p

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet