Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
I PK 61/05 Généré par l'IA

Supreme Court dismissed cassation, ruling termination justified by employee's poor availability and production disruption.

Numéro de cause I PK 61/05
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Pologne (PL)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff's cassation appeal against a labor court judgment that rejected her request to be reinstated to work. The plaintiff, a long-term employee, had been repeatedly absent due to illness and childcare, causing significant production disorganization for her team. The court held that the employer's termination was justified because the employee's lack of availability prevented her from fulfilling her duties, and no prior offer of alternative work was legally required. Consequently, the court found no violation of the Labor Code or social norms, upholding the employer's right to terminate the contract.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 45 § 1 k.p.; Art. 8 k.p.: The employer may terminate the employment contract for reasons concerning the employee or other non-employee factors, and justification is established if at least one reason is valid; prior offer of alternative work is not a prerequisite for lawful termination.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
termination of employment contract employee unavailability production disruption Labor Code provisions social norms violation cassation appeal dismissal alternative work offer

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 45 § 1 k.p.
Art. 8 k.p.
Art. 393 § 12 k.p.c.
Art. 102 k.p.c.
art. 45 k.p
art. 8 k.p
art. 45 § 1 k.p
art. 39311 k.p.c
art. 39312 k.p.c
art. 102 k.p.c

Jurisprudence citée

Généré par l'IA

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet