II UZ 53/05 Généré par l'IA

Supreme Court dismisses appeal; court has no duty to inform appointed counsel of deadline expiry.

Numéro de cause II UZ 53/05

Autorité / Tribunal Sąd Najwyższy

Juridiction

Pologne (PL)

Date de la décision 2005-09-26

Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the applicant's appeal against the appellate court's refusal to restore a missed cassation deadline. The applicant argued that the court violated procedural rules by failing to inform her appointed counsel of the deadline, while the appellate court held the delay resulted from the counsel's own negligence. The Supreme Court ruled that the law does not impose an obligation on the court to notify counsel of the deadline, and the delay was not excusable given the case's simplicity and the counsel's actions.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

art. 168 § 1 k.p.c.; art. 3934 k.p.c.; The court is not obliged to inform an appointed counsel of the expiration of the cassation deadline, and such failure cannot serve as a basis for restoring a missed deadline.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA

missed cassation deadline appointed counsel duty court notification obligation procedural restoration negligence of counsel

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA

art. 168 § 1 k.p.c.

art. 3934 k.p.c.

art. 3941 k.p.c.

art. 397 § 1 k.p.c.

art. 398 § 14 k.p.c.

art. 168 § 1 k.p.c

art. 169 § 1 k.p.c

art. 328 § 2 k.p.c

art. 361 k.p.c

art. 3934 k.p.c

Jurisprudence citée

Généré par l'IA

I CZ 62/00

Supreme Court holds appeal deadline ends when counsel has real ability to act, not when appointed.

Supreme Court dismisses appeal; court has no duty to inform appointed counsel of deadline expiry.

Synthèse Legislator

Regeste Legislator

Mots-clés

Dispositions légales citées

Jurisprudence citée

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Texte complet