Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
II UZP 7/05 Généré par l'IA

Supreme Court allows appeal dismissal for failure to specify claim value in social insurance cases.

Numéro de cause II UZP 7/05
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Pologne (PL)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Supreme Court upheld the District Court's dismissal of Anna K.'s appeal against a social insurance award for a work accident. The appellant failed to specify the monetary value of the disputed claim in her appeal, arguing instead that she had addressed the defect by stating the percentage of disability. The Court ruled that while the law requires a monetary valuation, the specific wording of the lower court's order to specify the value 'quantitatively' was ambiguous given the original award was in percentages, yet the general rule for property rights cases still permits dismissal for non-compliance.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

art. 368 § 2 k.p.c.; art. 370 k.p.c.: Failure to specify the value of the subject matter of the appeal in a property rights case constitutes a ground for its dismissal.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
social insurance law work accident compensation appeal procedural defects value of subject matter dismissal of appeal property rights cases formal requirements

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
art. 368 § 2 k.p.c.
art. 130 § 1 k.p.c.
art. 370 k.p.c.
art. 19-24 k.p.c.
art. 25 § 1 k.p.c.
art. 368 § 2 k.p.c
art. 130 § 1 k.p.c
art. 370 k.p.c
art. 368 § 1 k.p.c
art. 25 § 1 k.p.c

Jurisprudence citée

Généré par l'IA
I PZ 58/00
Supreme Court allows labor dispute appeal despite missing appeal value, ruling it does not block proper proceedings.
III UZ 20/04
Vague summons to cure formal defects in appeal prevents rejection if directed at unrepresented party. Appeal dismissed due to unclear court instructions. Court upheld appeal based on procedural fairness.
I PZ 158/02
II CZ 146/66
III CKN 871/98
III CZ 92/98
II UKN 553/98
Supreme Court allows appeal reinstatement when a party's confused letter indicates total misunderstanding of procedural defects.
III CRN 256/72
I PK 268/02
II UK 396/03
Supreme Court quashes pension decision for failing to recognize late appeal as formal objection.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet