Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
II UZ 25/05 Généré par l'IA

Supreme Court dismisses appeal when lawyer submits only an estimated value without calculation method.

Numéro de cause II UZ 25/05
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Pologne (PL)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal because the lawyer failed to provide a calculated value for the subject matter of the dispute. Although the client later retracted a previously submitted hypothetical value, the initial submission of an unexplained estimate was deemed insufficient under the Civil Procedure Code. Consequently, the court ruled that the appeal was inadmissible due to the lack of a specific calculation method for the disputed amount.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 3935 k.p.c.; Art. 3933 § 2 k.p.c.: An appeal is inadmissible if the lawyer submits only an estimated value without specifying the method of calculation for the subject matter of the dispute.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
cassation appeal inadmissibility subject matter value calculation method requirement estimated value insufficiency Civil Procedure Code

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 3935 k.p.c.
Art. 3933 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 39814 k.p.c.
Art. 3941 § 3 k.p.c.
art. 3933 § 2 k.p.c
art. 3941 § 3 k.p.c
art. 3921 § 1 k.p.c
art. 22 k.p.c

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet