Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
I PK 627/03 Généré par l'IA

Supreme Court allows appeal dismissing strike suspension agreement as it does not override mandatory pre-retirement protection.

Numéro de cause I PK 627/03
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Pologne (PL)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the employer's cassation appeal regarding a strike suspension agreement that reduced wages for a pre-retirement employee. The court found that while the suspension agreement legally suspended collective bargaining rules, it could not bypass the mandatory protections of Article 39 of the Labor Code applicable to employees nearing retirement. Consequently, the court ruled that the employer did not violate the employee's specific rights because the suspension did not explicitly cover this protected category.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 24127 k.p.; Art. 39 k.p. in conjunction with Art. 42 § 1 k.p.: A suspension agreement under Art. 24127 k.p. does not exempt pre-retirement employees from the mandatory protection against worsening working conditions provided by Art. 39 k.p.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
strike suspension agreement pre-retirement protection Labor Code provisions wage reduction mandatory legal standards

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 24127 k.p.
Art. 39 k.p.
Art. 42 § 1 k.p.
Art. 43 k.p.
Art. 393 § 12 k.p.c.
Art. 102 k.p.c.
Art. 393 § 19 k.p.c.
art. 24127 k.p
art. 42 § 1 k.p
art. 39 k.p

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet