Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
I PZ 58/02 Généré par l'IA

Notification of lawyer dismissal to court invalidates prior service; appeal deadline does not start until court is notified.

Numéro de cause I PZ 58/02
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Pologne (PL)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Supreme Court overturned the lower court's rejection of the plaintiff's appeal, ruling that the lawyer's dismissal was ineffective until the court was notified. The plaintiff's former lawyer submitted the appeal before the court received notice of the client's instruction to withdraw him. The court held that procedural acts by a former lawyer remain valid until the court is informed of the withdrawal, thereby preserving the appeal's timeliness.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 94 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 369 § 1 k.p.c.; Notification of lawyer dismissal to the court is required for the withdrawal to be effective; procedural acts by a former lawyer remain valid until such notification.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
lawyer dismissal court notification procedural validity appeal deadline representation withdrawal legal representation civil procedure

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 94 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 369 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 393 § 3 k.p.c.
Art. 397 § 2 k.p.c.
art. 94 § 1 k.p.c
art. 369 § 1 k.p.c
art. 397 § 2 k.p.c

Jurisprudence citée

Généré par l'IA
C.I. 1309/35
C.II. 2129/37
III CZP 33/87

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet