I PKN 786/00
Généré par l'IA
Supreme Court allows plaintiff to reclassify contract type after payment order objections without changing factual basis.
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe Supreme Court quashed lower court rulings and remanded the case for reconsideration. The plaintiff initially sued for payment based on an employment contract but later argued it was a service contract after objections were filed. The court held that reclassifying the legal nature of the contract is permissible as long as the underlying factual basis remains unchanged.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAArt. 496 k.p.c.; Art. 187 § 1 k.p.c.; A party may reclassify the legal nature of the contractual relationship after objections to a payment order are filed, provided the factual basis of the claim remains unchanged.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IA
payment order procedure
contract reclassification
factual basis unchanged
employment vs service contract
civil procedure code
Dispositions légales citées
Généré par l'IAArt. 496 k.p.c.
Art. 187 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 393 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 108 § 2 k.p.c.
art. 496 k.p.c
art. 476 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c
art. 65 § 2 k.c
art. 200 § 1 k.p.c
art. 22 § 1 k.p
art. 22 § 11 k.p
Jurisprudence citée
Généré par l'IAIII PZP 45/88
III PZP 17/70