Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
I PZ 93/01 Généré par l'IA

Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding misidentified defendant in labor dispute over municipal debt assumption.

Numéro de cause I PZ 93/01
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Pologne (PL)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by the Town of R. against a lower court order that had incorrectly identified the defendant. Although the plaintiff sued both the Town and a liquidated school, the lower courts inconsistently referred to the defendant as either the Town or the Town Office. The Supreme Court determined that the Town, as the legal entity responsible for the school's debts, was the proper defendant, and the error in naming the defendant in the contested decision was a clear mistake requiring correction.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 366 KPC; Art. 350 § 1, 3 KPC; Art. 393 § 1, 3 KPC; Art. 386 § 1 KPC; Art. 397 § 2 KPC: A clear error in identifying the defendant in a labor dispute judgment, where the municipality is liable for the debts of a liquidated employer, constitutes a ground for setting aside the decision under the Code of Civil Procedure.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
misidentified defendant labor dispute municipal debt assumption liquidated employer Code of Civil Procedure procedural error parties identification

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 366 KPC
Art. 350 § 1, 3 KPC
Art. 393 § 1, 3 KPC
Art. 386 § 1 KPC
Art. 397 § 2 KPC

Jurisprudence citée

Généré par l'IA
IV P 250/00
IV Pa 51/01
II CKN 817/97

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet