Supreme Court dismisses travel allowance claims for border guards, ruling the judicial route inadmissible.

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeals filed by border guards seeking travel allowances, ruling that the judicial route for such claims is inadmissible. Although the lower court found a procedural error regarding the binding nature of prior legal assessments, the Supreme Court held this did not prevent the judgment from being deemed consistent with the law. Consequently, the court rejected the claims because the underlying administrative procedure was invalid, rendering the entire litigation process unlawful.