Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
II UZ 123/00 Généré par l'IA

Criminal appeal dismissed as inadmissible due to insufficient value of the subject matter under procedural law.

Numéro de cause II UZ 123/00
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Pologne (PL)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the criminal appeal filed by Henryk B. against a lower court's rejection of his request for a higher miner's pension multiplier. The appellant argued for a value of 8,271.60 zł based on a comparison with another individual, while the court determined the value should be the difference between the current and hypothetical higher pension, totaling 1,563.84 zł. The court ruled the appeal inadmissible because this calculated amount fell below the statutory threshold for filing a cassation under Article 393 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 393 pkt 1 KPC; Art. 385 KPC: A criminal appeal is inadmissible if the value of the subject matter, calculated as the difference between the actual benefit and the hypothetical benefit under the contested provision, does not meet the statutory minimum threshold.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
criminal appeal inadmissibility value of subject matter miner's pension multiplier hypothetical benefit calculation procedural threshold requirement

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 393 pkt 1 KPC
Art. 385 KPC

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet