II UZ 113/00
Généré par l'IA
Polish Supreme Court dismisses appeal where late lawyer appointment does not reset filing deadlines due to client negligence.
Pologne (PL)
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe Supreme Court dismissed the appellant's appeal against a second-instance court's rejection of her request to reinstate the cassation deadline. The appellant had been properly notified of the deadline but failed to file a lawyer or request an extension until three days before expiration. The court ruled that merely appointing a lawyer late does not reopen the filing period because the delay was caused by the appellant's own unjustified inactivity.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAArt. 168 § 1 KPC; Art. 393 § 19 KPC: The appointment of a lawyer ex officio filed shortly before a deadline expires does not constitute a valid ground for reinstating the missed filing period if the delay was caused by the party's own unjustified inactivity.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IA
reinstatement of deadline
inactivity of the party
appointment of lawyer ex officio
cassation procedure
fault of the party
Dispositions légales citées
Généré par l'IAArt. 168 § 1 KPC
Art. 393 § 19 KPC
Art. 385 KPC
Jurisprudence citée
Généré par l'IAII CKN 724/99