I PKN 740/99
Généré par l'IA
Family situation alone does not prove employer's dismissal violates social coexistence principles under Art. 8 KP.
Pologne (PL)
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe Supreme Court dismissed the teacher's cassation appeal regarding her placement in non-active status. The court found that merely citing family responsibilities to support children was insufficient to prove the employer's action violated social coexistence principles. The decision emphasized that general clauses require specific factual justification and that the burden of proof for abuse of rights lies with the employee.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAArt. 8 KP; Art. 5 KC: General clauses like social coexistence principles serve to mitigate the effects of exercising a right within formal limits, but their application requires specific factual justification and cannot be invoked merely by citing family circumstances without concrete evidence of exceptional situations.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IA
social coexistence principles
abuse of rights
burden of proof
non-active status
family circumstances
general clauses
labor law
Dispositions légales citées
Généré par l'IAArt. 8 KP
Art. 5 KC
Art. 6 KC
Art. 300 KP
Art. 393 § 12 KPC