Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
II UKN 399/99 Généré par l'IA

Supreme Court dismisses request for third expert opinion when first expert rigidifies stance due to doubts.

Numéro de cause II UKN 399/99
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Pologne (PL)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Supreme Court of Poland dismissed the cassation appeal regarding a disability pension claim, sending the case back for retrial. The lower court had ordered a third expert opinion from the same specialist after the applicant criticized the initial medical assessment. The Supreme Court ruled that seeking another opinion from the same expert is irrational if the expert merely rigidifies their previous stance rather than expanding their analysis.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 286 in fine KPC; Art. 393 § 1 KPC: When an expert's additional opinion indicates they are rigidifying their previous stance due to doubts rather than expanding their analysis, the court is obligated to seek an opinion from a different expert.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
third expert opinion medical expert rigidification disability pension claim freedom of evidence assessment irrationality of additional opinion KPC procedural law medical expert competence

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 286 in fine KPC
Art. 393 § 1 KPC

Jurisprudence citée

Généré par l'IA
II URN 12/94 OSNAPiUS 1994 nr 4, poz. 71

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet