Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
I PKN 359/99 Généré par l'IA

Polish Supreme Court dismissed appeal; collective agreement wording insufficient to count prior employment for pension severance.

Numéro de cause I PKN 359/99
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Pologne (PL)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Polish Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by an employee against a lower court ruling. The employee argued that a collective agreement required counting all prior employment periods for higher pension severance, while the company contended the text only applied to continuous service. The court held that the specific wording distinguishing between groups meant prior periods could not be automatically included for those transferred from state enterprises.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 392 KPC; Art. 393 § 12 KPC: A collective agreement clause granting higher severance to employees with continuous service does not automatically extend to those transferred from other entities unless explicitly stated, and appeals regarding procedural costs are inadmissible if not separately adjudicated.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
collective agreement interpretation pension severance calculation continuous service requirement employee transfer rights cassation appeal dismissal labor law statutory reading procedural cost appeal

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 392 KPC
Art. 393 § 12 KPC
Art. 102 KPC
Art. 1541 KP
Art. 921 KP
art. 98 k.p.c

Jurisprudence citée

Généré par l'IA
I CZ 30/96

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet