Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
I PKN 20/99 Généré par l'IA

Supreme Court dismissed appeal, ruling expert opinion sufficed without new expert due to negative performance reviews.

Numéro de cause I PKN 20/99
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Pologne (PL)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by a dismissed academic against his termination and other claims. The lower court relied on a negative performance evaluation and an expert opinion stating the defendant's assigned tasks were feasible, rejecting the plaintiff's request for a new expert solely based on dissatisfaction. The court held that the defendant's complete refusal to perform duties, rather than task impossibility, justified the termination and the existing expert assessment was legally sufficient.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 233 § 1 KPC; Art. 286 KPC; Art. 94 ust. 1 pkt 2 ustawy o szkolnictwie wyższym: A request for a new expert opinion is not justified merely by a party's dissatisfaction with a previous opinion but requires specific circumstances indicating the original assessment was factually incorrect or legally insufficient.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
academic dismissal performance evaluation expert opinion sufficiency cassation appeal labor law dispute feasibility of tasks refusal to perform duties

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 233 § 1 KPC
Art. 286 KPC
Art. 94 ust. 1 pkt 2 ustawy z dnia 12 września 1990 r. o szkolnictwie wyższym
Art. 80 KP
Art. 39319 KPC
Art. 386 § 6 KPC
Art. 39317 KPC
Art. 39312 KPC

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet