Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
II UKN 21/99 Généré par l'IA

Supreme Court dismisses appeal on occupational disability pension due to medical improvement and lack of procedural guidance violation.

Numéro de cause II UKN 21/99
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Pologne (PL)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by Mark W. against a decision denying his occupational disability pension. The lower courts found that the applicant's occupational asthma no longer caused respiratory insufficiency or disability, and his knee issues were unrelated to his work injury. The court ruled that the applicant did not require specific procedural guidance regarding new expert opinions because the medical evidence already conclusively established the absence of occupational disability.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 5 KPC; Art. 393 § 1 KPC: The obligation to provide necessary procedural guidance applies only when a party without legal representation would be deprived of influence on the process; the court is not required to inform parties about evidence not essential to the established facts.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
occupational disability pension medical improvement procedural guidance expert opinion evidence cassation appeal dismissal

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 5 KPC
Art. 78 of the Act on Pension Provision for Employees and Their Families
Art. 87 of the Act on Pension Provision for Employees and Their Families
Art. 18 of the Act on Occupational Injuries and Diseases
Art. 393 § 1 KPC

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet