Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
I PKN 596/98 Généré par l'IA

Supreme Court dismisses late appeal request due to client's own negligence in appointing counsel.

Numéro de cause I PKN 596/98
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Pologne (PL)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal because the client failed to appoint legal counsel in a timely manner, causing the appeal to be filed after the deadline. Although the client argued that the holiday period justified the delay and that the lawyer's appointment should reset the timeline, the court held that the client bears responsibility for their own negligence. The decision established that without valid reasons, a party cannot extend procedural deadlines by appointing counsel after the original period has expired.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 393 2 KPC; Art. 169 § 1 KPC: A party's own negligence or indecision in appointing counsel does not justify restoring a procedural deadline if the appointment occurs after the original period has expired.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
procedural deadline counsel appointment client negligence cassation appeal time restoration legal representation court procedure

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 393 2 KPC
Art. 169 § 1 KPC
Art. 393 5 KPC
Art. 393 4 KPC
Art. 393 12 KPC
Art. 393 8 § 2 KPC
Art. 168 § 1 KPC

Jurisprudence citée

Généré par l'IA
I CZ 138/71

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet