I PKN 541/98
Généré par l'IA
Labor contract intent of one party insufficient to override agreed terms regarding pension severance pay.
Pologne (PL)
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal against the appellate court's decision to award pension severance pay to the employee. The court found that the appellate court incorrectly relied solely on the employer's unilateral intent rather than the mutual agreement of both parties to determine the contract's content. Consequently, the case was remanded to the appellate court for a new decision on the costs of the cassation proceedings.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAArt. 65 § 2 KC; Art. 382 KPC; Art. 233 § 1 KPC; Art. 393 § 1 KPC: The intent of only one party to a labor contract cannot serve as the basis for determining the disputed terms of the agreement; the court must establish the mutual intent of both parties.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IA
labor contract formation
mutual intent requirement
pension severance pay
unilateral intent invalidity
appellate court error
cassation proceedings
contract interpretation
Dispositions légales citées
Généré par l'IAArt. 65 § 2 KC
Art. 382 KPC
Art. 233 § 1 KPC
Art. 393 § 1 KPC