Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
II UKN 248/98 Généré par l'IA

Supreme Court dismisses cassation claiming procedural violation regarding court-ordered expert opinion on disability.

Numéro de cause II UKN 248/98
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Pologne (PL)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by Józef K. against a social insurance office's decision to withhold disability benefits. The appellant argued that the appellate court violated procedural rules by failing to admit evidence of his disability and ignoring inconsistencies in expert opinions. The court ruled that the appellate court's decision to admit a supplementary expert opinion was lawful and that the new findings confirmed the absence of work-related disability, rendering the procedural complaints without merit.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 232 KPC; Art. 233 § 1 KPC; Art. 393 § 1 pkt 2 KPC; The admission of evidence by the court of its own motion does not constitute a procedural violation if the resulting findings are consistent with the established facts and do not affect the outcome of the case.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
cassation appeal court-ordered evidence expert opinion disability benefits work accident procedural violation Supreme Court

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 232 KPC
Art. 233 § 1 KPC
Art. 393 § 1 pkt 2 KPC
Art. 18 of the Act of 12 June 1975 on benefits for work accidents and occupational diseases

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet