Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
II UKN 183/98 Généré par l'IA

Supreme Court dismisses appeal for evidence introduced late without prior necessity, upholding Art. 381 KPC application.

Numéro de cause II UKN 183/98
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Pologne (PL)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal against a lower court's refusal to admit new medical evidence presented for the first time in the second instance. The appellant argued that the need for this specific hospital record arose only after the first trial, but the court found the necessity existed earlier when the appellant cited other hospital treatments. Consequently, the court ruled that the lower court correctly applied Article 381 of the Code of Civil Procedure, which limits new evidence to cases where prior necessity was absent.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 381 KPC; Art. 393 § 1 pkt 2 KPC: The second instance court may admit evidence introduced for the first time only if the need for it did not exist in the first instance proceedings.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
evidence admissibility second instance procedure late evidence introduction civil procedure code cassation appeal dismissal medical record evidence procedural necessity

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 381 KPC
Art. 393 § 1 pkt 2 KPC
Art. 217 § 1 KPC

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet