Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
I PKN 234/98 Généré par l'IA

Supreme Court dismissed cassation where missing evidence citation did not justify overturning a labor court verdict.

Numéro de cause I PKN 234/98
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Pologne (PL)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by an employee against a labor court decision terminating his employment. The employee argued that the lower courts failed to cite specific evidence for their factual findings regarding his substitution of a fire extinguisher. The court ruled that such a procedural omission does not automatically constitute grounds for cassation unless it could have materially influenced the case outcome. Since the factual findings were supported by consistent witness testimony and the procedural defect had no impact on the final judgment, the appeal was rejected.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 393 § 1 pkt 2 KPC; Art. 231 KPC; Art. 264 § 2 KP; A failure to cite specific evidence in a judgment does not justify cassation unless the omission could have materially influenced the case outcome.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
labor law cassation procedural omission evidence citation material influence termination of employment labor court verdict witness testimony

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 393 § 1 pkt 2 KPC
Art. 231 KPC
Art. 264 § 2 KP

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet