I PKN 191/98
Généré par l'IA
Supreme Court dismisses labor claim where parties knowingly chose contract for work avoidance without intent to evade law.
Pologne (PL)
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe Supreme Court dismissed Felix M.'s appeal seeking to reclassify eighteen consecutive service contracts as employment contracts. The court found that Felix M. knowingly signed these contracts without objections, while the Agency employed him under service agreements to avoid labor law obligations. Consequently, the court ruled that the parties' mutual intent and the contract's purpose, rather than its name, determined its legal nature, rejecting the claim of legal avoidance.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAArt. 300 KPC; Art. 65 KC; Art. 3531 KC: The type of contract is determined by the parties' mutual intent and the contract's purpose, not its name, and a contract is valid unless it lacks a legal basis or is void due to other statutory grounds.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IA
contract classification
mutual intent
service contract
labor law avoidance
employee privilege
contract validity
party autonomy
Dispositions légales citées
Généré par l'IAArt. 300 KPC
Art. 65 KC
Art. 3531 KC
Art. 39315 KPC