Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
II UZ 30/98 Généré par l'IA

Supreme Court dismisses appeal when lawyer's power of attorney lacks specific authorization for cassation instance.

Numéro de cause II UZ 30/98
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Pologne (PL)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the appellant's appeal against the rejection of their cassation. The appellant's lawyer submitted a power of attorney that, despite containing a printed general clause, had handwritten additions limiting its scope to the first and second instances. The court held that the lawyer failed to provide a separate authorization for the cassation instance, which is a mandatory requirement under the Code of Civil Procedure. Consequently, the cassation was inadmissible due to the lack of proper representation for that specific procedural stage.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 393 § 1, 2 KPC; Art. 397 § 2, 385 KPC: A power of attorney submitted for filing a cassation must explicitly authorize the representative to act in the cassation instance; a general authorization limited to lower instances is insufficient, and failure to supplement this defect results in the inadmissibility of the cassation.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
power of attorney cassation instance admissibility requirement legal representation Code of Civil Procedure handwritten additions scope of authorization

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 393 § 1, 2 KPC
Art. 397 § 2 KPC
Art. 385 KPC

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet