II UKN 465/97
Généré par l'IA
Supreme Court dismisses appeal where factual presumption violated logic and medical evidence rules.
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal regarding a dispute over whether a worker's death constituted a work accident. The lower court relied on a factual presumption that an external cause caused the fall, despite established facts showing the victim suffered from severe internal illness and vomiting. The court ruled that such a presumption was invalid because it lacked logical prerequisites and contradicted expert opinions excluding external triggers.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAArt. 231 KPC; Art. 233 § 1 KPC: A factual presumption under Art. 231 KPC is valid only when it logically follows from established facts serving as its prerequisites and aligns with life experience.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IA
factual presumption
work accident
logical prerequisites
medical evidence
cassation appeal
external cause
internal illness
Dispositions légales citées
Généré par l'IAArt. 231 KPC
Art. 233 § 1 KPC
Art. 393 § 15 KPC
Art. 102 KPC