Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
II UKN 238/97 Généré par l'IA

Appeal misdirected to wrong court after proper notice does not justify missing statutory deadline under Polish Civil Procedure Code.

Numéro de cause II UKN 238/97
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Pologne (PL)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by a worker against a decision denying his request to restore the appeal deadline. The lower courts found that although the applicant's mother mailed the appeal to the wrong court, the applicant had been properly informed of the correct procedure and failed to exercise due diligence. The Supreme Court held that this error constituted negligence rather than a procedural violation warranting relief, thus upholding the dismissal of the appeal.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 369 § 1 KPC; Art. 392 § 1 KPC; Art. 393 § 12 KPC: Misdirection of an appeal to the wrong court after proper notice of procedure constitutes negligence and does not justify restoration of the deadline.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
civil procedure code appeal deadline misdirected appeal due diligence cassation appeal procedural negligence restoration of term

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 369 § 1 KPC
Art. 382 KPC
Art. 168 § 1 KPC
Art. 168 § 2 KPC
Art. 468 KPC
Art. 392 § 1 KPC
Art. 393 § 12 KPC

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet