Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
II UKN 77/96 Généré par l'IA

Supreme Court dismissed cassation for lack of grounds, upholding lower court's free evaluation of evidence in disability pension case.

Numéro de cause II UKN 77/96
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Pologne (PL)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by Grzegorz W. against the Second Instance Court's decision denying his claim for a rural disability pension. The appellant argued that the lower court improperly excluded an additional expert opinion from the Collegium Medicum, violating procedural rules regarding evidence evaluation. The court rejected this claim, ruling that the lower court correctly exercised its freedom of evidence assessment based on the existing medical records and expert opinions which consistently found the applicant capable of light farm work without constant care.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 233 § 1 KPC; Art. 393 § 12 KPC: The cassation court cannot review the substantive correctness of factual findings made by the lower court, as the lower court retains the freedom of evidence assessment unless a clear violation of procedural rules occurs.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
freedom of evidence assessment disability pension classification cassation admissibility medical expert opinions rural disability pension procedural review limits invalidity group I

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 233 § 1 KPC
Art. 393 § 12 KPC
Art. 393 § 15 KPC
Art. 21 ust. 2 ustawy z dnia 20 grudnia 1990 r. o ubezpieczeniu społecznym rolników
Art. 24 ust. 4 ustawy z dnia 14 grudnia 1982 r. o zaopatrzeniu emerytalnym pracowników i ich rodzin

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet