Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
I PKN 46/96 Généré par l'IA

Supreme Court dismissed appeal; employer selection violated social norms only if fired workers' personal situation is significantly worse than others.

Numéro de cause I PKN 46/96
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Pologne (PL)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by two employees seeking reinstatement after dismissal due to workforce reduction. The lower courts had previously ordered reinstatement based on the employer's failure to consider the personal circumstances of the dismissed workers compared to those retained. The Court ruled that while the employer's selection criteria were valid, reinstatement is only possible if the dismissed workers' personal situation is significantly worse than that of comparable employees who were not fired.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 8 ust. 1 k.r.s.; Art. 45 k.p.; The employer's selection of employees for dismissal under workforce reduction does not violate social norms unless the personal situation of the dismissed workers is significantly worse than that of comparable employees retained.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
workforce reduction dismissal social norms violation personal situation comparison reinstatement to employment freedom of contract labor law principles employer selection criteria

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 8 ust. 1 k.r.s.
Art. 45 k.p.
Art. 393 § 1 pkt 2 k.p.c.
Art. 393 § 2 k.p.c.

Jurisprudence citée

Généré par l'IA
III PZP 10/95 (OSNCP 1985 z. 11 poz. 164)

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet