II URN 36/96
Généré par l'IA
Supreme Court quashes social security court verdict for denying child support due to procedural invalidity from lack of defendant summons.
Pologne (PL)
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe Supreme Court quashed the lower court's verdict denying child support payments due to a procedural violation where the defendant was not summoned to participate. The defendant, Waldemar M., had not been notified of the proceedings before the social security organ, violating the requirement for his participation under the Civil Procedure Code. Consequently, the court declared the proceedings void for depriving the defendant of the right to defense and remanded the case for a new trial.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAArt. 477 11 § 2 KPC; Art. 369 pkt 5 KPC: Proceedings conducted without summoning an interested party who did not participate before the social security organ are void as they deprive the party of the right to defense.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IA
procedural invalidity
summons requirement
right to defense
social security proceedings
child support enforcement
void proceedings
remand for retrial
Dispositions légales citées
Généré par l'IAart. 477 11 § 2 KPC
art. 369 pkt 5 KPC
art. 154 § 1 i 2 KPA
art. 12 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 18 lipca 1974 r. o funduszu alimentacyjnym
Jurisprudence citée
Généré par l'IAII CR 155/75 - OSPiKA 1975 z. 3 s. 66