Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
I PRN 15/96 Généré par l'IA

Supreme Court dismisses dismissal of severance pay claim by shareholder employee due to flawed statutory interpretation.

Numéro de cause I PRN 15/96
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Pologne (PL)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Supreme Court of Poland dismissed the extraordinary review against a lower court's decision denying severance pay to an employee-shareholder. The lower courts incorrectly applied the law, ruling that the employee's status as a shareholder and the company's acquisition of assets barred the severance payment. The Supreme Court clarified that the statutory exclusion applies only when a third party acquires assets and then terminates the contract, not when the employer itself acquires assets and terminates the employment relationship.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 8 ust. 3 pkt 3 ustawy z dnia 28 grudnia 1989 r. o szczególnych zasadach rozwiązywania z pracownikami stosunków pracy z przyczyn dotyczących zakładu pracy; The statutory exclusion of severance pay for a shareholder employee applies only when a third party acquires the plant's assets and subsequently terminates the employment, not when the employer acquires the assets and terminates the contract itself.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
severance pay exclusion employee shareholder status plant asset acquisition extraordinary review labor law interpretation termination of employment Supreme Court ruling

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 8 ust. 3 pkt 3 of the Act of December 28, 1989 on special rules for resolving labor relations with employees due to reasons related to the plant and on amending certain acts
Art. 8 ust. 3 pkt 5 of the Act of December 28, 1989 on special rules for resolving labor relations with employees due to reasons related to the plant and on amending certain acts
Art. 422 § 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure
art. 3 § 2 k.p.c
art. 229 k.p.c
art. 422 § 2 k.p.c

Jurisprudence citée

Généré par l'IA
I PRN 20/93

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet