I PZP 29/95
Généré par l'IA
Supreme Court declines ruling on legal issue as prior precedent lacks current validity due to statutory amendment.
Pologne (PL)
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe Supreme Court refused to issue a binding ruling on a legal question regarding teacher bonuses and health leave. The lower court argued a 1990 precedent was obsolete after a 1992 law amendment removed the relevant article, while the Supreme Court noted the cited case failed to address the specific statutory changes. Consequently, the Court determined the issue did not warrant a new precedent, leaving the lower court to decide based on current law.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAArt. 391 § 2 k.p.c.; Art. 13 ust. 4 ustawy o Sądzie Najwyższym: A Supreme Court ruling binding only in the specific case does not create a precedent for other cases, and if the underlying legal basis has been amended, the question may not warrant a new ruling.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IA
precedent validity
statutory amendment
legal question ruling
binding effect
teacher bonus
health leave
Supreme Court procedure
Dispositions légales citées
Généré par l'IAArt. 391 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 1 ust. 6 ustawy z dnia 5 czerwca 1992 r. o zmianie Karty Nauczyciela
Art. 13 ust. 4 ustawy z dnia 20 września 1984 r. o Sądzie Najwyższym
§ 2 ust. 4 rozporządzenia Rady Ministrów z dnia 17 lutego 1986 r.
art. 391 § 2 k.p.c
art. 391 k.p.c
art. 391 § 1 k.p.c
Jurisprudence citée
Généré par l'IAIII PZP 53/89