Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ECLI:NL:RVS:2026:3776 ECLI:NL:RVS:2026:3776 Généré par l'IA

Administrative appeal dismissed due to late filing; applicant failed to prove timely deposit in court mailbox.

Numéro de cause ECLI:NL:RVS:2026:3776
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Pays-Bas (NL)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Council of State confirmed the lower court's decision declaring the administrative appeal inadmissible. The appellant deposited the appeal in the court's mailbox but failed to prove receipt before the statutory deadline of March 1, 2024. The court rejected the appellant's testimony and her husband's affidavit as insufficient objective evidence to establish timely delivery.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Article 8:40 of the General Administrative Law; Article 8:41 of the General Administrative Law: An administrative appeal is inadmissible if filed after the deadline, and the appellant bears the burden of proving timely receipt, which requires objective evidence beyond personal testimony.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
administrative appeal inadmissibility statutory deadline burden of proof mailbox deposit objective evidence testimony insufficiency

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Article 8:40 of the General Administrative Law
Article 8:41 of the General Administrative Law
artikel 8:67 van de Algemene wet bestuursrecht

Jurisprudence citée

Généré par l'IA

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet