Court dismisses review request as new arguments merely repeat prior hearing submissions without new facts.

The Administrative Law Board rejected the applicant's request to review its June 2024 decision, which had previously dismissed the appeal against a police officer's report. The applicant argued that audio recordings proved the officer's account of the disturbance was inaccurate and that the incident occurred on the street rather than in the home. The court determined that these arguments were a repetition of points already thoroughly examined and rejected during the original hearing, constituting no new facts or circumstances under Article 8:119 of the General Administrative Law.