Court declares appeal inadmissible due to missed deadline; appellant's professional title does not excuse delay.
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe Council of State declared the appellant's appeal against the Ombudsman's decision inadmissible because the appeal was filed one day after the statutory deadline expired. Although the appellant argued the time limit rules were unclear and claimed his use of the title 'master' and extensive legal experience warranted leniency, the court found no special circumstances justifying an extension. Consequently, the appeal was rejected as untimely, and the Ombudsman was not ordered to pay procedural costs.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAArticles 6:7, 6:8, 6:11, and 6:24 of the General Administrative Law: An appeal filed after the statutory period is inadmissible unless the delay is excusable; a professional title or general experience does not constitute a special circumstance excusing a missed deadline.