Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ECLI:NL:RVS:2025:5173 ECLI:NL:RVS:2025:5173 Généré par l'IA

Court declares appeal inadmissible due to missed deadline; appellant's professional title does not excuse delay.

Numéro de cause ECLI:NL:RVS:2025:5173
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Pays-Bas (NL)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Irrecevable (Inadmissible)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Council of State declared the appellant's appeal against the Ombudsman's decision inadmissible because the appeal was filed one day after the statutory deadline expired. Although the appellant argued the time limit rules were unclear and claimed his use of the title 'master' and extensive legal experience warranted leniency, the court found no special circumstances justifying an extension. Consequently, the appeal was rejected as untimely, and the Ombudsman was not ordered to pay procedural costs.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Articles 6:7, 6:8, 6:11, and 6:24 of the General Administrative Law: An appeal filed after the statutory period is inadmissible unless the delay is excusable; a professional title or general experience does not constitute a special circumstance excusing a missed deadline.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
administrative appeal statutory time limit missed deadline excusable delay procedural inadmissibility general administrative law Ombudsman decision

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Article 6:7 of the General Administrative Law
Article 6:8, first paragraph, of the General Administrative Law
Article 6:24 of the General Administrative Law
Article 6:11 of the General Administrative Law
artikel 8:67 van de Algemene wet bestuursrecht
artikel 6:11 van de Awb

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet