Request to set aside judges for bias due to side role and procedural silence rejected.

The Administrative Chamber of the Council of State dismissed the applicant's request to set aside the judges hearing his case. The applicant argued that a judge's concurrent role at a disciplinary college and the judges' refusal to forward his brief to parliamentary leaders created bias. The court held that a functional relationship in a side role does not prove legal impartiality and that procedural decisions on procedure do not constitute grounds for setting aside unless they reveal serious bias.