Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
Ordinanza — n. 20018/2026 — snpen Généré par l'IA

Criminal appeal dismissed as inadmissible due to personal filing violating procedural representation rules.

Numéro de cause Ordinanza — n. 20018/2026 — snpen
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Italie (IT)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Irrecevable (Inadmissible)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Court of Cassation declared the appeal inadmissible because it was filed personally by the appellant, violating mandatory representation rules. The appellant, Di Costanzo Giorgio, challenged a second-instance judgment without legal counsel, contrary to the specific procedural requirement for personal appeals. The court rejected the case de plano, ruling that no substantive review of the merits is possible when fundamental procedural defects exist.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 613, comma 1, n. 6 c.p.p.; Art. 616 c.p.p.: An appeal filed personally by the appellant in violation of mandatory representation rules is inadmissible, and the court may proceed de plano without examining the merits.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
personal appeal filing mandatory legal representation inadmissible appeal de plano procedure procedural defect représentation obligatoire par avocat représentation valable qualité pour recourir contre permis

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 613, comma 1, n. 6 c.p.p.
Art. 616 c.p.p.
art. 616 cod. proc. pen
Généré par l'IA
Ordinanza — n. 42595/2023 — snpen
Criminal appeal dismissed as inadmissible because the defendant personally drafted and signed the petition without a qualified lawyer.
Ordinanza — n. 17987/2022 — snpen
Cassation appeal dismissed for inadmissibility due to lack of proper legal representation by a qualified defense attorney.
Ordinanza — n. 8306/2023 — snpen
Cassation appeal dismissed as inadmissible due to lack of lawyer signature and absence of substantive grounds.
Ordinanza — n. 8426/2024 — snpen
Cassation appeal dismissed as inadmissible due to failure to comply with mandatory lawyer signature requirement under Art. 613 c.p.p.
Ordinanza — n. 26352/2023 — snpen
Cassation appeal dismissed for lack of defense and failure to state grounds under Art. 610 CPP.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

posto da: DI COSTANZO GIORGIO nato a VOLLA il 31/03/1958 avverso la sentenza del 07/07/2025 della CORTE APPELLO di NAPOLI udita la relazione svolta dal Consigliere BENEDETTO PATERNO' RADDUSA;letto il ricorso proposto da Di Costanzo Giorgio avverso la sentenza in epigrafe; esaminati gli atti e il provvedimento impugnato; ritenuto che il ricorso è inammissibile perché proposto personalmente dal ricorrente in violazione del disposto di cui al comma 1 dell'ad 613 cpp e che alla relativa declaratoria, cui conseguono le pronunce di cui all'art. 616 cod. proc. pen., può procedersi de plano P.Q.M