Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
Ordinanza — n. 18273/2026 — snpen Généré par l'IA

Criminal appeal dismissed for being filed personally by the appellant, resulting in a fine.

Numéro de cause Ordinanza — n. 18273/2026 — snpen
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Italie (IT)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Irrecevable (Inadmissible)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Court of Cassazione declared the appeal inadmissible because it was filed personally by the appellant rather than through a qualified lawyer. Geremia Adriano argued for the review of his conviction under Article 385 of the Penal Code, but the court found the procedural defect fatal. Consequently, the appeal was rejected, and the appellant was ordered to pay court costs and a fine to the State.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 100 c.p.p.; Art. 101 c.p.p.: An appeal in criminal proceedings must be filed by a lawyer; a personal filing renders the appeal inadmissible.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
criminal appeal personal filing inadmissible appeal court costs qualified lawyer départ illégal du pays renvoi malgré motifs médicaux assistance à l'évasion

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 100 c.p.p.
Art. 101 c.p.p.
art. 385 c.p
Généré par l'IA
Ordinanza — n. 35929/2024 — snpen
Criminal appeal dismissed for vague criticism lacking connection to the appealed judgment's factual findings.
Ordinanza — n. 34106/2024 — snpen
Italian Court dismisses appeal as inadmissible due to manifestly unfounded criticism of sentencing logic.
Ordinanza — n. 29823/2025 — snpen
Criminal appeal dismissed for generic grounds regarding recidivism exclusion failure.
Ordinanza — n. 33141/2023 — snpen
Criminal appeal dismissed for inadmissibility due to lack of specific reasoning on generic mitigating circumstances.
Ordinanza — n. 33837/2022 — snpen
Italian court dismisses appeal for evasion of home detention as generic and legally unfounded.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

nato a SAN SEVERO il 28/02/1995 avverso la sentenza del 08/07/2025 del TRIBUNALE di FOGGIA udita la relazione svolta dal Consigliere PIETRO SILVESTRI;R.G. n. 32670/2025 CONSIDERATO IN FATTO E IN DIRITTO Visti gli atti, la sentenza impugnata (condanna per il delitto di cui all'art. 385 c.p.); Esaminato il ricorso proposto da Geremia Adriano; Ritenuto il ricorso inammissibile, essendo stato proposto personalmente dalla parte, con conseguente condanna del ricorrente al pagamento delle spese processuali e della somma di euro tremila in favore della Cassa delle ammende; P. Q P.Q.M