Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
Ordinanza — n. 13264/2026 — snpen Généré par l'IA

Italian court dismisses vague local disturbance claim as inadmissible under criminal procedure code.

Numéro de cause Ordinanza — n. 13264/2026 — snpen
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Italie (IT)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Irrecevable (Inadmissible)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The court declared the remittal request inadmissible de plano without hearing the opposing party. The applicant argued local circumstances disturbed the trial, but the court found her facts vague and indeterminate. Consequently, the request was rejected and the applicant ordered to pay procedural costs.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 46 cod. proc. pen.; A remittal request based on vague allegations of local disturbance is inadmissible de plano if it fails to demonstrate a concrete threat to the trial's progress.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
criminal procedure code remittal request local disturbance inadmissible de plano procedural costs trial disruption vague allegations remise des frais de procédure

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 46 cod. proc. pen.
Visti gli atti, l'istanza di rimessione (art. 46 cod.
art. 46 cod. proc. pen
Visti gli atti, l'istanza di rimessione (art. 46 cod.
Généré par l'IA
Ordinanza — n. 10835/2025 — snpen
Cassation appeal dismissed for inadmissibility due to failure to allege admissible grounds and reliance on waived liability issues.
Ordinanza — n. 19293/2023 — snpen
Italian Court dismisses appeal against plea bargain as it lacks statutory grounds for review.
Ordinanza — n. 32436/2025 — snpen
Criminal appeal dismissed as inadmissible due to late filing and irrelevant subject matter.
Ordinanza — n. 25249/2025 — snpen
Cassation court dismisses appeal as inadmissible for challenging a non-appealable material correction order.
Ordinanza — n. 14656/2023 — snpen
Italian Court dismisses appeal on criminal continuability, citing lack of unitary criminal program and incongruous sentencing.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

BOHRER EVA ULRIKE nato il 20/11/1972 avverso il provvedimento del 02/10/2025 del TRIBUNALE di TERMINI IMERESE dato avviso alle parti; udita la relazione svolta dal Consigliere OMBRETTA DI GIOVINE;RITENUTO IN FATTO E

CONSIDERATO IN DIRITTO

Visti gli atti, l'istanza di rimessione (art. 46 cod. proc. pen.) e la memoria presentate personalmente da Eva Ulrike Beihrer; ritenuto che le circostanze dedotte nell'istanza appaiono vaghe e indeterminate, come tali non idonee a configurare l'esistenza di una situazione locale tale da turbare lo svolgimento del processo; ritenuto, dunque, che l'istanza va dichiarata inammissibile con procedura de plano, e conseguente condanna del ricorrente al pagamento delle spese processuali e della somma di euro tremila in favore della Cassa delle ammende P. P.Q.M