Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
Ordinanza — n. 12917/2026 — snpen Généré par l'IA

Criminal appeal dismissed for lack of qualified defense counsel signature under Italian Code of Criminal Procedure.

Numéro de cause Ordinanza — n. 12917/2026 — snpen
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Italie (IT)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Irrecevable (Inadmissible)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Court of Cassazione declared the appeal inadmissible because it was signed by the interested party rather than a qualified defense attorney. The appellant, Saidi Slim, failed to comply with the requirement that appeals be submitted by a lawyer enrolled in the special register. Consequently, the court ordered the dismissal of the appeal and imposed a fine of three thousand euros on the appellant.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 571, comma 1, and Art. 613, comma 1, of the Code of Criminal Procedure; Art. 610, comma 5-bis, of the Code of Criminal Procedure: An appeal must be signed by a qualified defense attorney; failure to comply renders the appeal inadmissible.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
qualified defense counsel special register requirement inadmissible appeal Code of Criminal Procedure procedural defect legal representation court of cassazione défaut de qualité du procureur

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 571, comma 1, of the Code of Criminal Procedure
Art. 613, comma 1, of the Code of Criminal Procedure
Art. 610, comma 5-bis, of the Code of Criminal Procedure
Rilevato, pertanto, che il ricorso deve essere dichiarato inammissibile, deplano, a norma dell'art. 610, comma 5-bis, cod.
Law n. 103 of 2017

Jurisprudence citée

Généré par l'IA
Sez. U, n. 8914 del 21/12/2017
103 del 2017;Sez. U, n. 8914 del 21/12/2017, dep.
Généré par l'IA
Ordinanza — n. 27550/2022 — snpen
Italian court dismisses appeal due to failure to file by a registered defense attorney.
Ordinanza — n. 17189/2024 — snpen
Criminal appeal dismissed as inadmissible because the petition was signed personally by the accused rather than by a registered defense attorney.
Ordinanza — n. 34497/2022 — snpen
Appeal dismissed for lack of counsel signature; appeal must be signed by a registered defense lawyer under criminal procedure code.
Ordinanza — n. 27777/2025 — snpen
Court dismisses appeal as personally presented by defendant, violating mandatory defense attorney signature rule.
Ordinanza — n. 17192/2024 — snpen
Criminal appeal dismissed as inadmissible because the petition was signed personally by the accused rather than by a qualified defense attorney.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

NCONAudita la relazione svolta dal Consigliere FRANCESCO ALIFFI;RITENUTO IN FATTO E CONSIDERATO IN DIRITTOVisti gli atti.Esaminati il ricorso e l'ordinanza impugnata.1. Rilevato che l'atto di impugnazione è stato proposto personalmentedall'interessato, Saidi Slim, mentre avrebbe dovuto essere sottoscritto dadifensore iscritto nell'albo speciale della Corte di cassazione (artt. 571, comma 1,e 613, comma 1, cod. proc. pen., come modificati dalla legge n. 103 del 2017;Sez. U, n. 8914 del 21/12/2017, dep. 2018, Aiello, Rv. 272010-01).2. Rilevato, pertanto, che il ricorso deve essere dichiarato inammissibile, deplano, a norma dell'art. 610, comma 5-bis, cod. proc. pen. (introdotto dallamedesima legge n. 103 del 2017), con la condanna del ricorrente al pagamentodelle spese processuali e della somma di tremila euro in favore della Cassa delleammende. P.Q.MDichiara inammissibile il ricorso e condanna il ricorrente al pagamento dellespese processuali e della somma di euro tremila in favore della Cassa delleammende.Così deciso, in Roma 26 marzo 2026Il Consigliere estensore Il Presidente