Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
Ordinanza — n. 7314/2026 — snpen Généré par l'IA

Cassation court dismisses appeal for non-compliance with agreed sentencing procedure rules.

Numéro de cause Ordinanza — n. 7314/2026 — snpen
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Italie (IT)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Irrecevable (Inadmissible)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Court of Cassation declared Mauro Lombardi's appeal regarding the sanctioning treatment inadmissible. The appellant challenged the 2025 appellate court judgment, arguing for a specific procedural review of the penalty. The court ruled that the appeal was filed for reasons not permitted by the agreed sentencing procedure, leading to dismissal and a fine.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 133 c.p.p.; Art. 134 c.p.p.: An appeal against a sanctioning treatment must comply with the agreed sentencing procedure; appeals filed for reasons outside this framework are inadmissible.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
agreed sentencing procedure sanctioning treatment appeal procedural inadmissibility Cassation dismissal non-compliant appeal contrôle de la peine mode de calcul de l'amende sanctions pénales

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 133 c.p.p.
Art. 134 c.p.p.
Généré par l'IA
Ordinanza — n. 238/2025 — snpen
Cassation court dismisses appeals claiming sentencing agreement violated will formation due to internal expectations.
Ordinanza — n. 11266/2025 — snpen
Criminal appeal dismissed as inadmissible due to lack of logical motivation in sentencing decision.
Ordinanza — n. 31226/2025 — snpen
Cassation court dismisses appeal for generic grounds lacking specific factual elements required by law.
Ordinanza — n. 20666/2026 — snpen
Cassation appeal against appellate settlement sentence dismissed as inadmissible due to penalty determination issues.
Ordinanza — n. 19817/2024 — snpen
Italian court dismisses appeal claiming insufficient sentencing motivation under Penal Code articles 132 and 133.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

a seguente ORDINANZA sul ricorso proposto da: LOMBARDI MAURO nato a ROMA il 12/02/1969 avverso la sentenza del 12/05/2025 della CORTE APPELLO di ROMAudita la relazione svolta dal Consigliere ANGELO CAPOZZI; 26633/25- DE PLANO OSSERVA Ritenuto che il ricorso in ordine al trattamento sanzionatorio è proposto per ragioni non consentite dal rito concordato sulla pena; Rilevato, pertanto, che il ricorso deve essere dichiarato inammissibile, con la condanna del ricorrente al pagamento delle spese processuali e della somma di euro tremila in favore della Cassa delle ammende. P. Q. M. Dichiara inammissibile il ricorso e condanna il ricorrente al pagamento delle spese processuali e della somma di euro tremila in favore della Cassa delle ammende. Così deciso il 23.01.20