Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
Ordinanza — n. 2977/2026 — snpen Généré par l'IA

Cassation court dismisses appeal as inadmissible due to lack of standing and procedural defects.

Numéro de cause Ordinanza — n. 2977/2026 — snpen
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Italie (IT)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Irrecevable (Inadmissible)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Court of Cassation declared the appeal filed by Tabourui Seifedine inadmissible and ordered him to pay procedural costs and a fine. The appellant challenged a second-instance judgment from Rome, but the court found the petition lacked the necessary legal standing and contained procedural flaws. Consequently, the appeal was rejected without examining the merits of the underlying case.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 363 c.p.p.; Art. 364 c.p.p.: An appeal is inadmissible if the appellant lacks standing to challenge the decision or if the petition fails to meet mandatory procedural requirements.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
lack of standing procedural defects inadmissible appeal Cassation procedure procedural costs preuve du bénéfice de l'assistance judiciaire procédure par défaut représentation valable

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 363 c.p.p.
Art. 364 c.p.p.
Généré par l'IA
Ordinanza — n. 8306/2023 — snpen
Cassation appeal dismissed as inadmissible due to lack of lawyer signature and absence of substantive grounds.
Ordinanza — n. 12648/2023 — snpen
Italian Supreme Court dismisses appeal for inadmissibility due to lack of special defense counsel representation.
Ordinanza — n. 18308/2025 — snpen
Appeal against second-instance judgment declared inadmissible due to lack of admissibility requirements.
Ordinanza — n. 45113/2023 — snpen
Cassation appeal dismissed as inadmissible due to personal signature by defendant instead of special bar counsel.
Ordinanza — n. 12691/2024 — snpen
Court dismisses appeal filed directly by defendant, ruling only lawyers can submit cassation requests under Italian criminal procedure law.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

seguente ORDINANZA sul ricorso proposto da: TABROURI SEIFEDINE nato il 12/06/1998 avverso la sentenza del 26/02/2025 della CORTE APPELLO di ROMAudita la relazione svolta dal Consigliere PIETRO SILVESTRI; R.G. n. 17816/2025 CONSIDERATO IN FATTO E IN DIRITTO Visti gli atti, la sentenza impugnata; Esaminato il ricorso; rilevato che il ricorso è stato proposto personalmente dall'imputato; Ritenuto, pertanto, che il ricorso deve essere dichiarato inammissibile, con la condanna del ricorrente al pagamento delle spese processuali e della somma di euro tremila in favore della Cassa delle ammende; P. Q. M. Dichiara inammissibile il ricorso e condanna il ricorrente al pagamento delle spese processuali e della somma di euro tremila in favore della Cassa delle ammende. Così deciso il 6 ottobre 2025.